It's at most half done, and it's probably confusing to read.
It might be a good idea to come back later.
Alternatively, you can prod me to write it.
Why Aren't There Issue Boards For Everything?
Last weekend, I attended the wonderful EAG London conference of the EA community. As my last talk and session before the closing session, I attended the talk by Lizka Vaintrob on AI Tools for Existential Security.
I do regularly think about them ever since I’ve read the great article on them—and whenever I do, I notice I’m a bit confused. My first instinct is always to just go with ‘normal’, non-AI pure software solutions that already would improve the state of the art instead.
And, as often is the case, one of the improvements I’ve been thinking about is issue boards.
Issue boards are a thing for open source projects (and I’d guess in some other places, too), where you can write up something that is wrong about how the project handles something (from its documentation to its website over its structure to its mental model to its implementation), and people can upvote and downvote it, and the maintainers are discussing stuff with you and opening and closing issues.
Aand.. those work fairly well?
So my question now